In every country
around the world, citizens go hungry regardless of the wealth and development
of the country. The problem is much more prevalent and noticeable in
third-world countries that lack food sources on a large scale, but even the
most technologically advanced countries experience the same problem on a
smaller scale. Thus, everyone is affected by this problem in some way and can
witness it nearby. From this personal connection, each person has a stake in
the formation of a solution to the widespread problem. The development and
implementation of a system that would produce and distribute adequate amounts
of food to all people would improve the world dramatically. As a result, people
would no longer have to worry about obtaining food sustenance and could focus
on meaningful contributions to the world.
In
the world today, humans have many rights but access to food is currently not
one of them. This policy negatively impacts the world as many people suffer and
struggle to survive due to not having the proper resources needed to obtain a
substantial amount of food. According to psychologist Abraham Maslow, a person
must satisfy his physiological needs, of which hunger is one, before being able
to concern any other types of needs (Maslow, 370-396). According to this
hierarchy of needs theory, needs of safety, belongingness, esteem, and
self-actualization cannot be achieved by those who lack the proper amount of
food to maintain a healthy life. Therefore, this problem limits the potential
of valuable human lives to the most basic level. In altering the economic
system to provide food to all people that would restore potential to their
lives and allow them to be positive contributors to society. So, the benefits
would be twofold as the lives were saved by providing the food and subsequently
enriched by allowing for energy to be focused on a different domain.
With the
agricultural and technological advances present in society, it is unacceptable
that food is not available to all humans so that their lives are sustained in
an equal manner. With the current free-market system for getting food, those
with extensive monetary resources can garner the best food products, while
those who lack such resources can only afford low quality food or sometimes
none at all. In order for the proper change to occur, increased food production
must first occur, followed by proper distribution of the food resources. In
order to address the food production, countries would have to cooperate to
create an organization that first determined the necessary amount of food for
each person. Then, the organization would need to contract and provide
necessary resources to farmers in the various countries to produce the
specified amount of food. With the implication of saving human lives, governments
should find much value in utilizing resources in this manner.
Next, the food
would have to be distributed based on population of people lacking the proper
amount of food, based on expert projections of a group within the newly created
organization. This structure to systematically target and provide food to those
in need would address the problem in the most organized way possible. The
method would require worldwide cooperation which would be very difficult to
achieve, but the possible outcomes should provide enough incentive for that to
happen. From the implementation, the world would be improved as all humans had
access to adequate food sources and could reach a higher level of potential.
Works
Cited
Maslow, A. H. "A Theory of Human
Motivation." Psychological Review (1943): 370-396. Print.
hahaha, this is what I get for reading blog posts in reverse order - I made a comment that is basically the poor man's version of Maslow's very true assessment in response to Sarah's post. ;-) I agree - so much potential that can't be realized. I'll be interested to see what you think of Thomas More's solution to food distribution when we get to his text!
ReplyDeleteThis is a really good idea! I wonder if there should also be a subsection of this proposed program that gives people resources to be self-sufficient in their food or to encourage the distribution of locally grown and produced food (like farming supplies, livestock, etc.) This could cut down on the chances of one or a few farming companies or governments having full control of the world's food supply.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I love how you mentioned Maslow and his hierarchy of needs. I think people often forget or are unaware that eating and drinking is a basic human need to survive and "breakfast is the most important meal of the day" isn't just something your mom says to get you to eat more, but rather it really does fuel you for the day. Though I really enjoy your idea, I wonder what exactly is the best way to make this happen. As you mentioned, it may be hard for the whole world to get on board and agree so how do we achieve this?
ReplyDeleteWell thankfully there are plenty of charities currently out there trying to make this a reality. Whether or not they are actually getting things done, people are trying anyway. This really should be considered more, as ending world hunger shouldn't be thought of as a lofty goal, instead it should be taken far more seriously.
ReplyDelete