The society
of Herland represents an extreme of collectivist culture. At the time the novel
was written, women lacked rights that were granted to men. This divide was present
in both collectivist and individualistic cultures across the world. In fact,
women in individualistic cultures gained rights sooner due to the cultural
encouragement to fight for one’s own desires, where collectivist cultures
instill that the stability and success of the county as a whole should be considered.
However, Charlotte Perkins Gillman has taken the idea of a culture that truly
values each individual equally from the collectivist vision. In Herland, all of
the inhabitants are women and they are all considered equal persons in the
society.
In the
society, motherhood is the most important duty of each and every citizen. It is
the task of the women of the society to properly raise and educate the children
above all else. With no means of expanding their world or making any outward
progress due to their isolation, the primary meaning for life is the
continuation of their species. Motherhood in Herland is so important to the
citizens that it has spawned its own religion. Mother Nature is considered the
overarching life force by which all parts of nature feed off of. Mother Nature
cares for the citizens through providing food and water and the citizens
respect the earth by replanting resources that they have used up. Additionally,
all remnants of natural goods that have not been used are returned to the earth
to enrich the soil (Gillman, 51). This cycle of motherhood that originates with
Mother Nature and is continued by the mothers in the society gives every woman
an equal part in the goal of the society to raise and mentor children.
The collectivist theme is taken to
such an extreme that the women talk in terms of “we” rather than in terms of “I.”
This word use annoys the men that travel to the society as outsiders from
Europe. Their exposure and adherence to individualistic culture prohibits them
from comprehending the absolute connectedness of the women in Herland. The collectivist
ideal is also present in their lawmaking. When thinking about enacting a law,
the impact of the decision on the children and on motherhood as a whole is
analyzed in detail. Laws are created only if they further the cause of
motherhood and receive unanimous agreement from the mothers (Gillman, 57). Yet, the unanimous agreement comes naturally
if the decision will benefit motherhood, since all members of the society value
that above all else.
There is one policy of Herland that
takes the collectivist culture ideal to such an extreme that personal equality
is undermined. When each woman becomes a mother, she is examined to see if she
is capable of properly raising the child. If it is decided that the mother
cannot educate the daughter to the expected standards, then the responsibility for
the child’s education will be given to another woman (Gillman, 70). While this
idea preserves the best interest of the child by allowing her to receive the
best education possible, it eliminates the personal right to raise one’s own daughter.
Naturally, the men are appalled by this idea coming from an individualistic
culture. It raises the ethical question of should the child’s right to the best
education or the mother’s right to raise her own child be considered more
important? This moral quandary shows that no culture can create total equality
for all while still having goals for the society.
Noel, I think you ask a very important question at the end of your post. Based on what you have said about the collectivism and given the fact that we have all read the book, I would think that the mother’s right to raise her own child wouldn’t be too much of an issue. If they are such a collectivist society then most likely women would find it normal and beneficial to the child to have the best education possible. As we are not a part of this “Herland,” I don’t think it is fair of us to say what is right or wrong, especially because the society seems to be functioning quite well and everyone seems to be happy. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
ReplyDeleteI honestly have trouble with Herland for its depiction of motherhood. It seems like to me that there is overwhelming pressure (through the religion, the surrounding community) that women are meant to be mothers. Obviously motherhood is important and at the time that Gilman was writing, motherhood was under appreciated. However, it feels like Gilman took it too far the other way. The women say that if you don't want to be pregnant, you just put it out of your mind but I'm not sure if it ever says that you can chose to never have children.
ReplyDeleteThis just strikes me as another way that Herland reinforces sexist ideas while trying to escape them. First the women seem to just have been waiting around for the men to come along and then motherhood is implied to be what women are meant for. It all seems like Gilman was almost at a society I could get behind and then she missed it.